Guide

PR Agency vs In-House PR Team: Which Is Right for a Mid-Size or Enterprise Tech Company?

How mid-size and enterprise tech companies decide between an in-house PR team, an agency, or both: what each does best, the real costs to compare, and how to make an agency work with an in-house comms team.

Need placements alongside your in-house team? Jamco PR works with in-house comms teams and delivers guaranteed placements on Business Insider, USA Today and AP News.

Book a callGet a free article

Prefer email? Tell us about your goals at joseph@jamcopr.com. We reply within one business day.

Short answer: most mid-size and enterprise tech companies end up with both. An in-house team owns the story, internal alignment and day-to-day communications. An agency adds media relationships, extra capacity and speed for launches, new markets and executive visibility. Pure in-house works when you have the budget for senior hires and steady news; pure agency works when you don't yet have a comms lead.

Full disclosure: this guide is written by Joseph Tannous, founder of Jamco PR, an agency that works with in-house comms teams at B2B and enterprise tech companies.

In-house team vs agency at a glance

In-house PR teamPR agency
Knows the businessDeeply, every dayLearns it; depth depends on the team
Media relationshipsLimited to the team's own contactsBroad, across many publications and markets
CapacityFixed; hard to scale for launchesScales up and down with the work
Cost structureSalaries, benefits, tools, recruiting timeRetainer, project fee or per-placement price
Speed to startMonths to hireWeeks, or days for placement-based work
Internal alignmentStrong: sits with leadership, legal and salesNeeds a clear owner inside the company

When an in-house team is the better choice

  • You have constant news flow: product releases, partnerships, executive moves every month
  • Communications need tight coordination with legal, investor relations or regulators
  • You can hire senior people who already have media relationships in your sector
  • Internal communications and employer brand are a large part of the job

When an agency is the better choice

  • You don't have a comms lead yet, or the team is one person
  • You need coverage in new markets (for example the US, UK or Gulf) where your team has no contacts
  • You have a deadline: a launch, funding round, RFP or conference
  • You want 5–10 executives made visible, which is more than a small team can handle
  • You want guaranteed placements on specific publications rather than pitching alone

The costs to compare

Compare the full cost of each option over a year, not the monthly fee against one salary. An in-house team costs salaries, benefits, tools (media databases, monitoring), recruiting time and the months before a new hire is productive. An agency costs its fee and the internal time needed to brief and approve.

Published agency benchmarks put a comprehensive B2B retainer at roughly $7,500–$15,000 a month, with larger multi-market programs higher. Placement-based models price per result instead: Jamco PR projects start at $5,000, with the publications agreed before you pay.

How to make an agency work with an in-house team

  • Name one internal owner who approves messages and quotes
  • Split the work clearly: in-house owns the narrative and internal approvals; the agency owns outreach, placements and new markets
  • Agree the target publications and executives up front
  • Share the sales calendar so coverage lands when deals need it
  • Report on articles published and how sales used them, not pitches sent

Where Jamco PR fits

Jamco PR works alongside in-house comms teams as the placement engine: guaranteed placements on Business Insider, USA Today, Yahoo Finance, AP News and 35+ other publications, agreed before you pay. The first placement can go live in as little as 24 hours, and most clients see their first article within 14 days. Any placement that doesn't go live within 60 days is replaced with another top-tier outlet at no extra cost.

Recent client results

Real Jamco PR placements you can read today. Most clients see their first article within 14 days.

Know a tech company that needs this? Refer them and earn 10% of their first payment.

About the author

Joseph Tannous is the founder of Jamco PR, which has helped 50+ tech companies and their executives get on Business Insider, USA Today and top-tier publications. Favikon ranks him the #1 Corporate Communications & PR voice in Estonia. More about Joseph · LinkedIn

Frequently asked questions

Is it better to hire an in-house PR person or an agency?

It depends on news flow and budget. An in-house person suits companies with constant news and a need for tight internal coordination; an agency suits companies that need media relationships, new markets or results by a deadline. Many mid-size and enterprise tech companies use both.

Can a PR agency work with an existing in-house comms team?

Yes. The usual split is that the in-house team owns the narrative and approvals, and the agency handles outreach, placements, executive visibility and new markets.

Is an agency cheaper than an in-house PR team?

Compare a full year: salaries, benefits, tools and hiring time for in-house, against the agency fee plus internal time. Published B2B retainer benchmarks are roughly $7,500–$15,000 a month; placement-based options such as Jamco PR start at $5,000 per project.

What does an agency add that an in-house team can't?

Broad media relationships across publications and markets, extra capacity for launches and multiple executives, and, with placement-based agencies, guaranteed placements on named publications.

More guides

Client case studies

Our services

Want to get on top-tier publications?

Book a call and we'll show you which outlets fit your story, and how fast we can get you there.

Book a callGet a free article

Prefer email? Tell us about your goals at joseph@jamcopr.com. We reply within one business day.

★ 4.4 on TrustpilotAn AI security company got on Business Insider in 16 days, then closed its pre-seed round two weeks later.